Change passivity into active scientific research service management model to improve the level of scientific research in primary hospitals / 中华医学科研管理杂志

Objective Taking into account of the particular characteristics of research in primary hospitals,explore the possible impact of active research service management model for the promotion of scientific research in primary hospitals.Methods By comparing the differences of research characteristics between the university affiliated hospitals and primary hospitals,this paper explores the role of active research management services in the process of project application and daily management in the primary hospital,and the establishment of feasible scientific research incentive measurements and evaluation system.Results Implementation of the active research service management mode can improve the satisfaction degree of researchers to the research management department,and more importantly,improve the scientific research level of primary hospitals.Conclusions Scientific research managers in primary hospitals can better understand the needs of researchers,solve practical problems,release the burden of researchers,and enhance their enthusiasm for scientific research by implementing active service management mode,so as to enhance the level of scientific research in hospitals.

Analysis of current situation of domestic multi-center study from medicine papers / 中华医学科研管理杂志

Objective To analyze the current situation of domestic multi-center study of medicine research in order to improve the scientific research level.Method Using the bibliometrics method to analyze the number of coauthors,research institutions, research states distribution,foundation paper numbers and large sample papers of 200 multicenter original research papers published in 10 domestic and foreign journals in 2010.Results There were 112 domestic original research papers,the number of average coauthor was 6.1± 1.1; 15.2％ of them were more than 3research institutions; 2.7％ of them were cooperative study of more than 2 countries.49 papers (43.8％)were supported by fund; 10.7％ of which were more than 3 foundations; large sample papers account for 24.1 ％.In 88 foreign original research papers,the number of average coauthors is 9.8± 2.7; 86.4％ of them are under more than 3 research institutions; 44.3％ of them are cooperative study of more than 2 countries.Fund papers account for 69.3 ％ ; large sample papers account for 50％.There were significant difference in the number of coauthors,research institutions,number of countries,large sample papers and the number of ≥3 foundation papers between both domestic and international paper(P ＜ 0.05).The number of domestic and foreign funded papers had no significant difference (P ＞0.05).ConclusionThere are some differences between domestic and foreign medical cooperative research. We should strengthen the international and domestic cooperative research in order to improve the scientific research level and reduce the waste of resources.